The History Of Aircrafts And Jet Based GeoEngineering And Weather Modification

Aircrafts and jets based GeoEngineering and Weather Modification has been going on since 1950 within actual knowledge of all stakeholders, including United Nations (UN). Even if we ignore the chemical and metallic composition of aerosols emitted by these aircrafts and jets still it is very clear that their role as GeoEngineering and Weather Modification methods was well known to scientists and politicians world over.

The scope of  this article is not to discuss whether these emissions were contrails or chemtrails as we would cover this aspect seperately. In the present  article we are proving that world at large was aware of the GeoEngineering and Weather Modification role of aircrafts and jets emissions still  nothing was done to prevent them for almost 70 years.

In 2019 nations are claiming that these contrails may have “inadvertently” resulted in GeoEngineering and Weather Modfication. But we at PTLB firmly believe that this was not inadvertent but a deliberate act to allow aircrafts and jets emissions based GeoEngineering and Weather Modification that has brought disastrous results in our present times.

Let us start the discussion on this topic. In 1958, protests were raised against emissions from jets above as the tourist trade was severely effected due to clouds coverage by such jets emissions.

In 1963, Walter Orr Roberts opined that jet airplane contrails are modifying the climate.

In 1963, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) got an Air America Beechcraft and had it rigged up with silver iodide. There was another demonstration by people in Vietnam and U.S. seeded the South Vietnam area and created rain.

In 1968, Reid A. Bryson said that jet aircraft contrails were one of the more recent types of cirrus clouds, which are comprised of ice crystals at high altitude. Where jets are operating today, cirrus clouds have increased by 5% to 10%, Bryson said. He estimated that if the day came when 300 supersonic transports were in the air at one time, the region of operation of most SST’s “might easily be 100% covered with cirrus clouds.” The net effect of this would be further to reduce the heating of the earth, and blue skies might become a rarity.

In 1970, Illinois and New Jersey officials decided not to settle pollution suits against the nation’s major airlines out of court, despite an agreement between the airlines and the federal government to lean up the jet aircraft exhaust.  Representatives of 31 major domestic airlines agreed to install “burner cans” to eliminate most of the smoke from their nearly 1,000 aircraft by 1972.

In 1970, during the Ninety-first Congress, second session, on S. 3229, S. 3466 and S. 3546 hearing, Secretary John A. Volpe of Transportation informed that airline representatives and govt officials met and obtained their agreement to retrofit the present fleet of planes that produces the largest amount or smoke. He informed that instead of being completed in 1974, as had been originally suggested, they agreed to complete this retrofit operation by 1972. Under the plan, the devices were required to be installed on engines whenever they were “down” for routine overhaul after about 5,000 flying hours each on the average. An estimated 3,000 Pratt & Whitney JT8D engines, mostly on Boeing 727, 737 and McDonnell Douglas DC9 short haul craft, required modification. The devices were improved combustors (the chambers in which the fuel is ignited) and were manufactured by Pratt & Whitney.”

In 1971, a study revealed that a jet air plane in one landing and takeoff drenches the environment with as much soot as 2,500 automobiles produce in a entire day.

In 1974, direct manufacture of carbon dust (Pdf) on aircraft or from carbon particle generating sources on ships or at surface sites was encouraged. This was done to avoid the clumping, packing, and logistical problems of obtaining the carbon particles from the factory.

If carbon particles are dispersed directly from carbon generating burners, they would convert liquid hydrocarbon fuel to CO2. This reduced logistical hurdles and ensured that right sized CO2 particles were dispersed in 1974 without anybody noticing.

By slightly modifying readily available jet engines of 1974, carbon dust particles could have been produced and dispersed into air at a rate of 20-30,000 pounds per hour per engine. Lies were also spread to support climate change and global warming rhetoric.

Use of afterburner type jet engines to generate carbon directly was suggested in 1974. This was cheapest, most convenient, and secretive alternative for GeoEngineering,  global cooling and criminal climate change purposes.

On April 1990 Hughes Aircraft Company suggests GeoEngineering jet fuel.  The United States Patent 5003186  was granted to it for Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for that it claimed could reduce global warming. The particles could have been seeded by dispersal from seeding aircraft; one exemplary technique may be via the jet fuel as suggested by prior work regarding the metallic particles. Once the tiny particles were dispersed into the atmosphere, these particles remained in suspension for up to one year.

For history from 1991 to 2015, please see this website.

After much protests from people challenging the contrails theory of politicians, nations have started accepting that emissions from aircrafts are producing strong GeoEngineering and Weather Modification changes since 1950. Keeping in mind the widely know impact of such emissions since 1950 to all stakeholders, the “Inadvertent GeoEngineering” theory of nations is another lie to fool people. The nations have to accept that they knew about the happening of this GeoEngineering and Weather Modification since 1950 and they deliberately failed to curb the same.

Sun Has A Direct And Substantial Impact Upon Warming And Cooling Of Earth

Fake news, false propaganda and public opinion manipulations are going on since ages. There is virtually no area where these tactics have not been used. But when it comes to global warming hoax, these tactics have taken shape of even mass scale brainwashing of public. Wherever critical thinkers challenged the obvious lie of gloabl warming due to CO2, these thinkers were labelled as conspiracy theorists, skeptics, etc. Nevertheless, public spirited individuals and many scientists kept on telling the truth. Because of these wonderful human beings we are in a position to discuss about the ways and methods to save our environment and the future of our planet earth. Unfortunately, even the United Nations (UN) got swayed away by this false propaganda and it wasted many precious decades upon incorrect, inappropriate and even dangerous options like GeoEngineering and Solar GeoEngineering.

There are many reasons for warming and cooling of earth and scientists have closely observed periods of Solar Minimum and Solar Maximum for ages. We are not discussing these reasons for warming of earth here as the scope of this article is to analyse whether sunlight or solar radiation can create global warming or not?

Why this point and subject is important at all? Because if sun is creating global warming, then the global warming hoax created against CO2 emissions by road transports would be busted. That is why it is of paramount importance that solar radiation or sun heat must be removed from the equation of global warming.

There is no uniformity of opinion in this regard. The proponents of CO2 induced global warming are denying effect of sun while many other scientists are simply not convinced. They belive sun is the true source of global warming/cooling and they have validly proven this fact using data and analysis of Solar minimum and Solar Maximum periods of many centuries.

The Solar Minimum period witnessed global cooling while Solar maximum period witnessed global warming. Those who believe that global warming is a hoax frequently cite these scientific opinions and literature. Irrespective of what pro and anti global warming people say, we have analyse the situation and position on our own.

On the face of it the argument that fossil fuels generated CO2 is responsible for global warming is absurd and against common sense. Even this argument has been twisted and misrepresented multiple times and has lost its appeal due to dishonesty and suppression of other factors and facts.

For instance, the lie that 97% climate scientists believe that global warming is caused by CO2 has done more damage that proving the point. The truth is that only 1.6 percent explicitly stated that man-made greenhouse gases caused at least 50 percent of global warming. In fact, the scientists who were claimed to be part of this 97% lies openly rejected this false assumption. Even the very greenhouse gases that are frequiently blamed for global warming consist of other gases too besides CO2.

So what the most dedicated 1.6% supporter of global warming are saying is that along with various gases, CO2 is one of the gas that has produced at least 50% of global warming.  The remaining 50% cannot be attributed to solar radiation by the proponents of global warming otherwise the very foundation of CO2 being the culprit would collapse.

“Variations in solar energy output have far more effect on Earth’s climate than soccer moms driving SUVs,” Southwestern Law School professor Joerg Knipprath, writes in his ‘Token Conservative’ blog. “A rational thinker would understand that, especially if he or she has some understanding of the limits of human influence. But the global warming boosters have this unbounded hubris that it is humans who control nature, and that human activity can terminally despoil the planet as well as cause its salvation.”

Many climate scientists agree that sunspots and solar wind could be playing a role in climate change. Because when sunspot numbers rise and fall, there is more going on than simply changes in solar brightness. Periods of reduced sunspot activity correspond to periods of reduced magnetic activity on the sun, and reduced outflows of charges particles from the sun (the so-called solar wind). The solar wind whizzes past the Earth and deflects cosmic rays from deep space from hitting our atmosphere. A recent proposal from Danish scientists suggest that when cosmic rays strike our atmosphere, they create tiny aerosol particles that lead to increased cloud formation and less sunlight hitting the Earth. So it’s a double whammy, fewer sunspots mean a dimmer sun, which also means more cosmic rays into the atmosphere and more cloud cover which further cools the Earth. And vice-versa when there is more solar activity.

Computer models of the climate do not take these indirect effects of solar activity into account when calculating the change in global climate. And while human activity counts for only 5% of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere each year, the sun accounts for ALL the energy striking the Earth and driving its dynamic and enormously complex ocean currents and atmosphere.

For many years, solar scientists considered variation in solar irradiance to be too small to cause significant climate changes. However, Svensmark has proposed a new concept of how the sun may impact Earth’s climate (Svensmark and Calder, 2007; Svensmark and Friis-Christensen, 1997; Svensmark et al., 2007). Svensmark recognised the importance of cloud generation as a result of ionization in the atmosphere caused by cosmic rays. Clouds highly reflect incoming sunlight and tend to cool the Earth. The amount of cosmic radiation is greatly affected by the sun’s magnetic field, so during times of weak solar magnetic field, more cosmic radiation reaches the Earth. Thus, perhaps variation in the intensity of the solar magnetic field may play an important role in climate change.

Man-made carbon dioxide is cited as a cause to produce global warming. However, in an article entitled “Does Carbon Dioxide Drive Global Warming?” Larry Vardiman presented several major reasons why carbon dioxide is probably not the primary cause. But if carbon dioxide is not the cause, then what is? Evidence is accumulating that cosmic rays associated with fluctuations in the sun’s electromagnetic field may be what drives global warming. A new theory called cosmoclimatology that proposes a natural mechanism for climate fluctuations has been developed by Henrik Svensmark, Head of the Center for Sun-Climate Research at the Danish National Space Center.

Edward L. Maunder reported in 1904 that the number of spots on the sun has an 11-year cycle.  Sunspots can be observed in real time online at www.spaceweather.com. Figure below shows a 400-year record of the monthly number of sunspots. Note the low number of sunspots in the period from 1645 to 1715. This period is called the Maunder Minimum and coincides with the Little Ice Age, the coldest period of temperature during the last 1,000 years.

In 1995, Henrik Svensmark discovered a startling connection between the cosmic ray flux from space and cloud cover. He found that when the sun is more active-more sunspots, a stronger magnetic field, larger auroras, stronger solar winds, etc.-fewer cosmic rays strike the earth and cloud cover is reduced, resulting in warmer temperatures.

For the 22-year period from 1983 to 2005, the average amount of low-level cloud follows the flux of cosmic rays very closely. In fact, Svensmark claims that the correlation coefficient is 0.92, a very high correlation for this type of data. In addition, when looking at various longer periods of record using proxy data for these two variables, he also found good correlations and similar trends. In particular, he suggested that during the Little Ice Age when the sun was inactive, cosmic ray flux from space was high, cloud amount was greater, and global temperatures were cooler. As the sun became more active after 1750, cosmic ray flux decreased, cloud amount decreased, and global temperatures warmed. Svensmark proposed that the global warming we’ve experienced for the past 150 years is a direct result of an increase in solar activity and attendant warming.

A potential change in cloud cover of 3-4 percent caused by changes in cosmic ray flux is sufficient to explain global temperature changes of several degrees due to the change in the reflectivity of clouds. The reason the variation in direct radiation from the sun was rejected earlier is because it has been found to vary only by a few tenths of a percent. This is insufficient to explain observed global warming.

These statistical correlations are intriguing, but many critics are skeptical of Svensmark’s theory until he can explain the mechanism by which cosmic rays create more clouds. This led him to design a laboratory experiment to demonstrate that cosmic rays produce more cloud nuclei on which cloud droplets can form. In 2007, Svensmark et al published the results of an experiment which confirmed his theory that cosmic rays increase the number of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). [ See Svensmark, H. et al. 2007. Experimental evidence for the role of ions in particle nucleation under atmospheric conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 463 (2078): 385-396.]

Svensmark’s theory of cosmoclimatology is now complete. He has discovered a complete chain of events that explains the variations in global temperature that have puzzled climatologists for so many years, and that has now led to an explanation for the recent global warming episode. It starts with cosmic rays coming to earth from exploding supernovas and collisions of remnants of stars with nebula in space. Many of these cosmic rays are shielded from striking the earth by the electromagnetic activity of the sun. When the sun is active, the solar wind prevents cosmic rays from entering the earth’s atmosphere by sweeping them around the earth. When the sun is inactive, more of them penetrate the atmosphere. Upon reaching the lower atmosphere where more sulphur dioxide, water vapor, and ozone is present, the cosmic rays ionize the air, releasing electrons that aid in the formation of more CCN and form more dense clouds. This increase in low-cloud amount reflects more solar energy to space, cooling the planet. Variations in electromagnetic activity of the sun and fluctuations in cosmic ray intensity from space result in the periodic warming and cooling of the earth.

Solar-modulated cosmic ray processes successfully explain the recent global warming episode. It would be prudent for the political leadership in the U. S. and the world/UN to look more closely at Svensmark’s theory of cosmoclimatology for an explanation of global warming before restructuring our entire economic system to eliminate carbon dioxide. If, in fact, Svensmark is correct, reducing the concentration of carbon dioxide will have little impact, anyway.

UN Blatantly Lied About Global Warming Due To CO2 Emissions By Fossils Fuels

The tussle between global cooling and global warming has been going on even before 1960’s. Upto 1962 we were discussing ways to warm up the Arctic but with the death of Harry Wexler in 1962 things changed forever. In the 1963 GeoEngineering proposals to warm the Arctic took a largely unexplained U-turn when oceanographer, Roger Revelle’s research concluded that carbon dioxide was already warming the climate for free and without the need for expensive and risky geoengineering projects. The worst part was that the lies, hoax and false propaganda of global warming was spread by those having vested interests. There was neither any agreement nor any global consensus among the stakeholders involved in this field in 1970.

Even after almost 50 years the lie of global warming is not only shamelessly peddled but it has even been supported by United Nations (UN). Instead of scientific and conclusive studies in this field, UN preferred to rely upon lies, presumptions, conjectures and surmises. As a result nations imposed carbon emissions tax and other financial penalties that were utilised for even worst sinister purposes .i.e. GeoEngineering and manipulation of earth’s climate using earth based and space based technologies.

A big lie was also spread that 97% of the climate scientists believe that global warming is a man-made disaster. Firstly, there is nothing like “global warming” as even within a country one place may be having a snowfall while other may be facing severe heat. So UN and its so-called scientists used data fudging and labelled “regional warming” as “global warming” to continue its global warming hoax.

Secondly, 97% scientists, climate scientists, physicists, etc have never claimed that global warming is a result of man-made actions like CO2 emissions of fossil fuels. On the contrary, only 1.6 percent explicitly stated that man-made greenhouse gases caused at least 50 percent of global warming. In fact, the scientists who were claimed to be part of this 97% lies openly rejected this false assumption.

In their process to continue to peddle this lie UN and its scientists are doing greater damage to our environment and earth. They are trying to justify GeoEngineering and manipulation of earth’s environment using unscientific, untested, dangerous and irreversible technologies. This time we should not let the climate criminals manipulate us and our earth to suit their own commercial interests.